UPDATED: 09-08-25 10:43 PDT

men Seton Hill 2
  
Seton Hill            
W-L: (17- 1) PR = 98.5868

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 215 H Roberts Wesleyan ECC ( 6- 8, 89.5) 23- 5 222 A Chestnut Hill CACC ( 7- 6, 89.7) 14- 1 301 N Tampa SSC (18- 0, 99.9) 8-13 305 A Lake Erie GMAC ( 7- 7, 88.2) 13- 5 308 H Indianapolis GLVC ( 7- 8, 94.3) 15- 5 315 H Thomas More GMAC ( 1-11, 83.0) 29- 4 318 H Wheeling GMAC ( 8- 7, 88.4) 30- 5 322 H Pace NE10 (11- 4, 95.7) 16- 5 325 H Davis & Elkins GMAC ( 2-15, 79.7) 33- 2 329 A Lewis GLVC (12- 5, 95.1) 17- 9 405 H Malone GMAC ( 5-10, 84.9) 29- 2 410 A Tiffin GMAC ( 3- 9, 84.3) 17- 6 412 A Northwood GMAC ( 5- 9, 86.6) 26- 5 416 H Frostburg State ECC ( 7- 9, 91.0) 18- 2 419 H Davenport GLVC ( 6- 9, 88.4) 25- 5 422 A Walsh GMAC (10- 8, 89.9) 25-11 430 H Wheeling GMAC ( 8- 7, 88.4) 29- 4 503 H Walsh GMAC (10- 8, 89.9) 20- 5 507 H Wilmington (DE) CACC (11- 4, 91.9)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   215 H Roberts Wesleyan       23- 5      18    10           0.00
   222 A Chestnut Hill          14- 1      13     8           0.00
   301 N Tampa                   8-13      -5    -1    -     -3.69
   305 A Lake Erie              13- 5       8    10           0.00
   308 H Indianapolis           15- 5      10     5           0.11
   315 H Thomas More            29- 4      25    16           0.00
   318 H Wheeling               30- 5      25    11           0.00
   322 H Pace                   16- 5      11     4           1.44
   325 H Davis & Elkins         33- 2      31    20           0.00
   329 A Lewis                  17- 9       8     3    +      2.14
   405 H Malone                 29- 2      27    14           0.00
   410 A Tiffin                 17- 6      11    14           0.00
   412 A Northwood              26- 5      21    11           0.00
   416 H Frostburg State        18- 2      16     8           0.00
   419 H Davenport              25- 5      20    11           0.00
   422 A Walsh                  25-11      14     8           0.00
   430 H Wheeling               29- 4      25    11           0.00
   503 H Walsh                  20- 5      15     9           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   301 N Tampa                   8-13      -5    -1    -     -3.69

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   329 A Lewis                  17- 9       8     3    +      2.14

Seton Hill Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Adams State Seton Hill   Seton Hill
Adelphi Adelphi tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Adelphi
Alabama-Huntsville Seton Hill Seton Hill   2- 0 vs 0- 2
American International Seton Hill insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Seton Hill
Anderson (SC) Seton Hill   Seton Hill
Assumption Seton Hill insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Seton Hill
Barton Seton Hill   Seton Hill
Belmont Abbey Seton Hill   Seton Hill
Bentley Seton Hill insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Seton Hill
Bridgeport Seton Hill insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Seton Hill
Caldwell Seton Hill Seton Hill   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Catawba Seton Hill   Seton Hill
Chestnut Hill Seton Hill Seton Hill  
Chowan Seton Hill   Seton Hill
Coker Seton Hill   Seton Hill
Colorado Mesa Seton Hill   Seton Hill
Concordia-Irvine Seton Hill tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Seton Hill
D'Youville Seton Hill Seton Hill   6- 0 vs 3- 3
Davenport Seton Hill Seton Hill  
Davis & Elkins Seton Hill Seton Hill  
District of Columbia Seton Hill Seton Hill   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Dominican (CA) Seton Hill   Seton Hill
Dominican (NY) Seton Hill insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Seton Hill
Embry-Riddle Seton Hill tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Seton Hill
Emmanuel (GA) Seton Hill tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Seton Hill
Emory & Henry Seton Hill insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Seton Hill
Felician Seton Hill Seton Hill   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Flagler Seton Hill tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Seton Hill
Florida Southern Seton Hill tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Seton Hill
Florida Tech Seton Hill tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Seton Hill
Franklin Pierce Seton Hill insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Seton Hill
Frostburg State Seton Hill Seton Hill  
Georgian Court Seton Hill insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Seton Hill
Holy Family Seton Hill Seton Hill   4- 0 vs 2- 2
Indianapolis Seton Hill Seton Hill  
Lake Erie Seton Hill Seton Hill  
Lander Seton Hill tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Seton Hill
Lees-McRae Seton Hill tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Seton Hill
Lenoir-Rhyne Seton Hill tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Seton Hill
Lewis Seton Hill Seton Hill  
Limestone Limestone tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) Limestone
Lincoln Memorial Seton Hill tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Seton Hill
Lynn Seton Hill tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Seton Hill
Malone Seton Hill Seton Hill  
Mars Hill Seton Hill tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Seton Hill
Maryville Seton Hill insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) Seton Hill
Mercy Seton Hill tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Seton Hill
Molloy Seton Hill insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) Seton Hill
Montevallo Seton Hill tied - ( 4- 0) ( 4- 0) Seton Hill
Mount Olive Seton Hill   Seton Hill
Newberry Seton Hill Seton Hill   2- 0 vs 0- 2
North Greenville Seton Hill   Seton Hill
Northwood Seton Hill Seton Hill  
Pace Seton Hill Seton Hill  
Palm Beach Atlantic Seton Hill tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Seton Hill
Post Seton Hill insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Seton Hill
Quincy Seton Hill Seton Hill   4- 0 vs 2- 2
Roberts Wesleyan Seton Hill Seton Hill  
Rockhurst Seton Hill tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) Seton Hill
Rollins Seton Hill tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Seton Hill
Shorter Seton Hill insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Seton Hill
Southern New Hampshire Seton Hill insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Seton Hill
St Anselm Seton Hill tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Seton Hill
St Leo Seton Hill tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Seton Hill
St Michaels Seton Hill insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) Seton Hill
St Thomas Aquinas Seton Hill Seton Hill   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Tampa Tampa Tampa  
Thomas More Seton Hill Seton Hill  
Tiffin Seton Hill Seton Hill  
Tusculum Seton Hill tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Seton Hill
Virginia State Seton Hill insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Seton Hill
Walsh Seton Hill Seton Hill  
Westminster (UT) Seton Hill insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Seton Hill
Wheeling Seton Hill Seton Hill  
William Jewell Seton Hill Seton Hill   4- 0 vs 1- 3
Wilmington (DE) Seton Hill insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) Seton Hill
Wingate Seton Hill   Seton Hill
Young Harris Seton Hill   Seton Hill

PowerWise = 75


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 14.61

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Roberts Wesley  ( 6- 8, 89.5)    23- 5      -10.35      14.74      -0.64         0.81            11.44
   0 A Chestnut Hill   ( 7- 6, 89.7)    14- 1      -10.18      14.91       0.64         0.81            12.63
   0 N Tampa           (18- 0, 99.9)     8-13       -0.00      25.10      -0.00         0.81            -0.00
   0 A Lake Erie       ( 7- 7, 88.2)    13- 5      -11.72      13.37       0.64         0.81            11.37
   0 H Indianapolis    ( 7- 8, 94.3)    15- 5       -5.55      19.54      -0.64         0.81            15.34
   0 H Thomas More     ( 1-11, 83.0)    29- 4      -16.95       8.15      -0.64         0.81             6.09
   0 H Wheeling        ( 8- 7, 88.4)    30- 5      -11.47      13.62      -0.64         0.81            10.53
   0 H Pace            (11- 4, 95.7)    16- 5       -4.23      20.87      -0.64         0.81            16.41
   0 H Davis & Elkins  ( 2-15, 79.7)    33- 2      -20.22       4.88      -0.64         0.81             3.44
   0 A Lewis           (12- 5, 95.1)    17- 9       -4.82      20.28       0.64         0.81            16.98
   0 H Malone          ( 5-10, 84.9)    29- 2      -15.00      10.10      -0.64         0.81             7.67
   0 A Tiffin          ( 3- 9, 84.3)    17- 6      -15.63       9.46       0.64         0.81             8.20
   0 A Northwood       ( 5- 9, 86.6)    26- 5      -13.27      11.82       0.64         0.81            10.12
   0 H Frostburg Stat  ( 7- 9, 91.0)    18- 2       -8.87      16.22      -0.64         0.81            12.64
   0 H Davenport       ( 6- 9, 88.4)    25- 5      -11.52      13.58      -0.64         0.81            10.49
   0 A Walsh           (10- 8, 89.9)    25-11      -10.04      15.05       0.64         0.81            12.74
   0 H Wheeling        ( 8- 7, 88.4)    29- 4      -11.47      13.62      -0.64         0.81            10.53
   0 H Walsh           (10- 8, 89.9)    20- 5      -10.04      15.05      -0.64         0.81            11.69
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       188.32

winning pts = 188.3215 losing points = 0.0000

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------